Stay up to date with sales tax: Join our mailing list!


On March 10, 2015, a bipartisan group of senators introduced the Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015. Similar legislation – the Marketplace Fairness Act of 2013 – was previously introduced in February 2013 and passed by the Senate on May 6, 2013. That legislation failed to be enacted. If passed, the Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015 would authorize states meeting certain requirements to require remote sellers that do not meet a "small seller exception" to collect their state and local sales and use taxes. For more information on the previous legislation, visit Federal Government Introduces New Remote Seller Bill. (Marketplace Fairness Act of 2015, March 10, 2015)

 

UPDATE: This bill failed to pass during the 114th Congressional Session running from January 3, 2015 to January 3, 2017.  Therefore, this bill has died and would need to be reintroduced to be considered and voted on.

(03/16/2015)

On December 16, 2014, President Barack Obama signed the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, for sales and use tax purposes. The Act includes a provision that extends the Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA) until October 1, 2015 with all provisions unchanged.

 

On January 9, 2015, the House of Representative introduced a bill (un-numbered) that would permanently extend the ITFA, banning states and local jurisdictions from imposing any new tax on internet access. The proposed bill removes the current effective dates of November 1, 2003 through October 1, 2015 and changes the effective date to be effective for new taxes imposed after the date of the enactment.  It is not clear if states that have been grandfathered under the existing provision could retain their current tax on internet access but it appears that may be the case.  No formal legislation has been introduced that would incorporate the Marketplace Fairness Act into this bill. The bill is sponsored by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, among others.

 

For our previous news item on this topic, see Internet Tax Freedom Act is Extended Through December 11, 2014.

 

For an update on this news item, see Internet Tax Freedom Act Extended Until December 11, 2015.

 

(Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015; H.R. 235)

(02/12/2015)

President Barack Obama has signed federal legislation extending the Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA) through December 11, 2014 as part of the joint resolution which made continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015. The ITFA was previously set to expire on November 1, 2014. The ITFA bars state and local governments from imposing multiple or discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce and taxes on Internet access.

 

For an update to this news item, see Internet Tax Freedom Act Extended Until October 1, 2015, Permanent Extension Introduced.

 

(P.L. 113-164 (H.J. Res. 124), 113th Congress, 2nd Session, Laws 2014)

(09/26/2014)

Alabama has adopted a new nexus rule outlining a business’s obligation to collect and remit local (county and municipal) sales and use tax, whether or not that business has a permanent physical location in the state. The rule will apply to all transactions occurring on or after January 1, 2014.  Any seller responsible for collecting and remitting state sales or use tax with respect to a sales or taxable use must collect and remit the corresponding sales or use tax for the appropriate local jurisdictions - including home rule authorities.  A seller may only avoid the obligation to collect and remit local sales and use tax on a transaction if the seller’s physical presence in the locality would not have been sufficient to create a state sales and use tax collection obligation if the transaction been an interstate transaction. The threshold used to determine whether a seller is obligated to collect and remit state sales or use tax for an interstate transaction will be used to determine whether the seller is obligated to collect and remit local sales or use tax by examining the contacts the seller has within each local jurisdiction where local sales or use tax is due. Activities that create a physical presence in a locality include delivery of goods in the retailer’s own vehicle, sales solicitation with shipment from outside the locality via common carrier and other activities where physical presence is established by the retailer.  An obligation to collect and remit a local jurisdiction’s sales or use tax under this rule does not obligate the business to file a return for or pay any other local tax or fee such as a local business license. This rule does not address sourcing issues associated with the determination of where tax is due or in which local jurisdiction tax is due. (Rule 810-6-5-.04.02, Alabama Department of Revenue, effective November 29, 2013, applicable on or after January 1, 2014)

(02/24/2014)

Representative Lamar Smith (Republican, Texas) has introduced a bill to bar multiple taxes on digital goods and services.  Smith had proposed an earlier bill which failed to pass.  This bill is a revised version of the earlier bill. The proposed bill – called the Digital Goods and Services Tax Fairness Act of 2013 – would only allow a state to tax sales of digital goods and services to customers with a tax address within that state. Additionally, states would be barred from imposing multiple taxes on digital goods. The bill defines digital goods as sounds, images, data and facts maintained in digital form. Internet access service is not included as a digital good in the bill. (H.R. 3724)

(01/28/2014)

Pages

Scroll to Top