Stay up to date with sales tax: Join our mailing list!


On July 17, 2014, the California State Board of Equalization (BOE) adopted a regulation to implement the partial sales and use tax exemption for manufacturing and research and development (R&D) equipmentwhich was effective July 1, 2014. The regulation implements, interprets, and makes specific the partial sales and use tax exemption and prescribes the form of the partial exemption certificate that must be furnished to the retailer. The partial exemption reduces the state tax rate to 3.3125% plus applicable district taxes and applies to the state general fund portion of the sales and use tax rate, but does not apply to any local, city, county or district taxes. To see our previous news item on this topic, see California Enacts Manufacturing and R&D Exemption. (News Release 106-14-G, California State Board of Equalization, July 18, 2014)

(09/26/2014)

President Barack Obama has signed federal legislation extending the Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA) through December 11, 2014 as part of the joint resolution which made continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015. The ITFA was previously set to expire on November 1, 2014. The ITFA bars state and local governments from imposing multiple or discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce and taxes on Internet access.

 

For an update to this news item, see Internet Tax Freedom Act Extended Until October 1, 2015, Permanent Extension Introduced.

 

(P.L. 113-164 (H.J. Res. 124), 113th Congress, 2nd Session, Laws 2014)

(09/26/2014)

The California State Board of Equalization (BOE) has issued a notice that discusses the sales and use tax applicability for transactions in which virtual currencies (e.g. Bitcoin) are accepted as payment for sales of goods and services in the same manner as transactions paid using traditional payment methods. The IRS has issued a notice stating that virtual currencies do not have legal tender status in any jurisdiction and should not be treated as United States currency or foreign currency, but instead, as property. The same holds for purposes of the California Sales and Use Tax Law. Tax applies to sales of tangible personal property in exchange for virtual currency in the same manner as with any other sale of tangible personal property for consideration. The measure of tax is the total amount of the sale or lease, whether received in money or other consideration. California tax law provides that the measure of tax from a barter or exchange transaction includes any amount allowed by a retailer to the customer for property or services of any kind. As a result, if a retailer enters into a contract in which the consideration is virtual currency, the measure of tax from the sale of the product is the amount allowed by the retailer in exchange for the virtual currency. Retailers who accept virtual currency as payment are instructed to retain documentation on the amount for which they regularly sell the same or similar property to their customers when payment is made in U.S. dollars. Retailers transacting business using virtual currency will need to insure their billing and receivables processes have the ability to value the virtual currency and to add the sales tax due to the transaction.  If they accept the virtual currency as consideration of the sales tax amount due, they will need to have access to traditional US currency to remit the tax as the BOE does not accept virtual currencies as a payment method for any tax or fee program. (Special Notice L-382, California State Board of Equalization, June 2014)

(06/24/2014)

Implementation of California’s Medi-Cal managed care sales tax program has been delayed pending federal approval. The implementation date has not yet been determined. The California Board of Equalization (BOE) will notify taxpayers once the program is approved. Medi-Cal managed care plan sellers will not be required to pay the taxes until they receive the capitation payments from the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS). The tax will be retroactive to the effective date of July 1, 2013. Anyone who has already registered as a retailer with the BOE under this program does not need to register again. For more information on this tax see our prior news item here. (Special Notice L-367, California State Board of Equalization, October 2013)

(04/29/2014)

Under the plain language of the San Francisco ordinance that imposes a California local transient occupancy tax of 6% of the rent charged by the operator on transients for occupying a hotel, online travel companies (OTCs) had no tax liability. An appellate court held that the San Francisco ordinance does not impose a tax on the service fees and markups charged by the OTCs. The tax is imposed on the rent charged by the hotel operator, and the tax obligations are only imposed on transients and hotel operators. The ordinance does not include a provision that imposes a tax liability on any entity other than the hotel operator or the transient. The city argued that the taxable amount is the total amount shown on the guest receipt, which includes the OTC’s markup as part of the total charged to the transient. The court disagreed and found that the ordinance contains language that limits the taxable rent to the amount charged for the room occupancy. Additionally, the ordinance includes a list of items included in the definition of "rent" and the list does not include OTC service fees. In an opinion following a rehearing of the case, the appellate court held that the language of the ordinance does not reveal the intent to impose a tax on the service fees and markups charged by the OTCs.(In re Transient Occupancy Tax Cases, Court of Appeal of California, Second District, No. B243800, March 5, 2014; In re Transient Occupancy Tax Cases, Court of Appeal of California, Second District, No. B243800, March 27, 2014)

(04/07/2014)

Pages

Scroll to Top